🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the implication of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would dictate when and where protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already weakened this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these progressive assaults on freedom have effectively abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a British mosque. There should be widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you can't draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the nation, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning threshold by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for carrying signs opposing mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.